“Namuslu kadın” ve “namuslu erkek” sosyal temsillerinin incelenmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 94, -

Ezgi Kaşdarma , Leman Pınar Tosun

https://doi.org/10.31828/turkpsikoloji.1477647

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki namuslu kadın ve namuslu erkeğe dair sosyal temsillerin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, “namuslu bir kadın” ve “namuslu bir erkek” kavramlarına ilişkin serbest çağrışım görevi, 157 katılımcıya (76 erkek, 81 kadın) uygulanmıştır. Katılımcıların verdikleri cevaplar üzerinde prototip analizi ve kümeleme analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar, çalışmanın beklentileriyle uyumlu bir biçimde, namuslu kadına ve namuslu erkeğe ilişkin sosyal temsil içeriklerinden bazılarının birbiriyle örtüşürken, diğer bazılarının tek bir cinsiyete özgü olduğunu göstermiştir. Spesifik olarak, prototip analizi sonuçları “iffetli” ve “terbiyeli” özelliklerinin sadece namuslu kadını tanımlamada, “çalışkan” “adil” ve “eşini aldatmayan” özelliklerinin ise sadece namuslu erkeği tanımlamada kullanıldığını ortaya koymuştur. Kümeleme analizi sonuçları, namuslu kadın sosyal temsiline ait tematik kümelerin bir kısmının içeriklerinin namuslu erkek sosyal temsilinin içerikleriyle benzeştiğini, bir kısmının ise (örneğin, kadınlık rolü ve erkeklik rolü tematik kümeleri) farklılaştığını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Namus, sosyal temsiller, toplumsal cinsiyet, prototip analizi, kümeleme analizi

Etik Beyan

Mevcut makale Doç. Dr. Leman Pınar Tosun Danışmanlığında Ezgi Kaşdarma tarafından gerçekleştirilen 650747 numaralı YÖK doktora tezinden üretilmiştir.

Teşekkür

Çalışma boyunca sunduğu değerli fikir ve desteklerinden dolayı Sayın Prof. Dr. M. Ersin Kuşdil’e teşekkürlerimizi sunarız.

Kaynakça

• Abric, J. C. (1993). Central system, peripheral system: their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 75-78.
• Aslani, S., Ramirez-Marin, J., Semnani-Azad, Z., Brett, J. M. ve Tinsley, C. (2013). Dignity, face, and honor cultures: Implications for negotiation and conflict management. M. Olekalns & W.L. Adair (Ed.), Handbook of research on negotiation içinde (249-282). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Augoustinos, M. ve Walker, I. (1998). The construction of stereotypes within social psychology: From social cognition to ideology. Theory & Psychology, 8(5), 629-652. doi: 10.1177/0959354398085003
• Barnes, C. D., Brown, R. P. ve Osterman, L. L. (2012). Don’t tread on me: Masculine honor ideology in the US and militant responses to terrorism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1018-1029. doi: 10.1177/014616721244338
• Basu, S., Zuo, X., Lou, C., Acharya, R. ve Lundgren, R. (2017). Learning to be gendered: Gender socialization in early adolescence among urban poor in Delhi, India, and Shanghai, China. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(4), S24-S29. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.03.012
• Başoğlu, G. S. (2014). Türkiye’de iktidar ilişkileri açısından namus kavramsallaştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye: Basılmamış Yükseklisans Tezi.
• Bosson, J. K. ve Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 82-86. doi: 10.1177/0963721411402669
• Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E. ve Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex‐role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00018.x
• Budziszewska, M., Hansen, K. ve Bilewicz, M. (2014). Backlash over gender-fair language: The impact of feminine job titles on men’s and women’s perception of women. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(6), 681-691. doi: 10.1177/0261927X14544371
• Burr, V. (2012). Sosyal inşacılık (Arkonaç, S. Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2003).
• Caffaro, F., Ferraris, F. ve Schmidt, S. (2014). Gender differences in the perception of honour killing in individualist versus collectivistic cultures: Comparison between Italy and Turkey. Sex Roles, 71(9), 296-318. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0413-5
• Cesur, S., Tepe, B., Piyale, Z. E., Sunar, D. ve Biten, A. F. (2020). “Bana göre” ahlak: sıradan insanın ahlakı kavramsallaştırması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 23(45), 115-138, doi: 10.31828/tpy1301996120200219m000021
• Ceylan, S., Doğulu, C. ve Akbaş, G. (2016). Namus adına kadına yönelik şiddete dair sosyal temsiller: Karma yöntemli bir çalışma. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19, 50-60.
• Chartier, J. F. ve Meunier, J. G. (2011). Text mining methods for social representation analysis in large corpora. Papers on Social Representations, 20(2), 1-47.
• Chaves, M. M. N., dos Santos, A. P. R., dos Santosa, N. P. ve Larocca, L. M. (2017). Use of the software IRAMUTEQ in qualitative research: An experience report. A. P. Costa, L. P. Reisde, F. N. Sousa, A. Moreira ve D. Lamas (Ed.), Computer supported qualitative research içinde (39-48). New York: Springer Publishing.
• Condor, S. ve Gibson, S. (2007). ‘Everybody's entitled to their own opinion’: Ideological dilemmas of liberal individualism and active citizenship. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(2), 115-140. doi: 10.1002/casp.885
• Constantin, A. ve Voicu, M. (2015). Attitudes towards gender roles in cross-cultural surveys: Content validity and cross-cultural measurement invariance. Social Indicators Research, 123, 733-751. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0758-8
• Cross, S. E., Uskul, A. K., Gerçek-Swing, B., Sunbay, Z., Alözkan, C., Günsoy, C., ... ve Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2014). Cultural prototypes and dimensions of honor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 232-249. doi: 10.1177/0146167213510323
• Çoymak, A. (2020). Functions of social representations in honour violence: The “Other East” as responsible. Social Justice Research, 33(3), 284-307. doi: 10.1007/s11211-020-00349-6
• Dany, L., Urdapilleta, I. ve Monaco, G. L. (2015). Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods. Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 489-507. doi: 10.1007/s11135-014-0005-z
• deRosa, A. S., Bocci, E. ve Dryjanska, L. (2018). The generativity and attractiveness of Social Representations Theory from multiple paradigmatic approaches in various thematic domains. Papers on Social Representations, 27(1), 1-35.
• Dilmaç, J. A. (2014). “Our” honor and “their” honor: The case of honor killings in Turkey. M. T. Segal ve V. Demos (Ed.), Gendered perspectives on conflict and violence: Part B içinde (251-274). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Doğan, R. (2014). Different cultural understandings of honor that inspire killing: An inquiry into the defendant’s perspective. Homicide Studies, 18(4), 363-388. doi: 10.1177/1088767914526717
• Doise, W., Clemence, A. ve Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. Routledge.
• Eagly, A. H. ve Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408-423. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
• Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A. M., ... ve Volpato, C. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles, 54, 603-614. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9027-x
• Ebert, I. D., Steffens, M. C. ve Kroth, A. (2014). Warm, but maybe not so competent? Contemporary implicit stereotypes of women and men in Germany. Sex Roles, 70, 359-375. ¬¬
• Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298.
• Farr, R. M. (1993). Common sense, science and social representations. Public Understanding of Science, 2(3), 189-204, doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/2/3/001
• Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R. ve Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske ve G. Lindzey (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology içinde (915–981). United States: McGraw-Hill.
• Gallen, C., Pantin-Sohier, G. ve Peyrat-Guillard, D. (2019). Cognitive acceptance mechanisms of discontinuous food innovations: The case of insects in France. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 34(1), 48-73. doi: 10.1177/2051570718791785
• Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Akbaş, G., Orta, I. M. ve Ceylan, S. (2016). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles, 75, 543-554.
• Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74(3), 1029-1042. doi: 10.1093/sf/74.3.1029
• Günindi-Ersöz, A. (2016). Toplumsal cinsiyet sosyolojisi. Anı Yayınevi, Ankara.
• Haj-Yahia, M. M. (1998). Beliefs about wife beating among Palestinian women: The influence of their patriarchal ideology. Violence Against Women, 4(5), 533-558. doi: 10.1177/1077801298004005002
• Handfield, T. ve Thrasher, J. (2019). Two of a kind: Are norms of honor a species of morality? Biology & Philosophy, 34(3), 39. doi: 10.1007/s10539-019-9693-z
• Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75-89.
• Kalav, A. (2015). Değişen ve dönüşen sosyal bir olgu olarak namus ve toplumsal cinsiyet. Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya, Türkiye: Basılmamış Yükseklisans Tezi.
• Kancı, D. (2013). Cumhuriyetin ilk yıllarından bugünlere ders kitaplarında kadınlık ve erkeklik kurguları. Mutluer, N. (Ed.), Cinsiyet halleri: Türkiye'de toplumsal cinsiyetin kesişim sınırları içinde (88-102). İstanbul: Varlık Yayınları.
• Kandiyoti, D. (2016). Modernin cinsiyeti: Türk modernleşmesi araştırmalarında eksik boyutlar. Bozdoğan, S. ve Kasaba, R. (Ed.), Türkiye'de modernleşme ve ulusal kimlik içinde (115-134). Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
• Kaşdarma, E. (2023). Değerler ile Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rollerine İlişkin Geleneksel Tutum Arasındaki İlişkide Toplumsal Cinsiyet Kalıpyargılarının Aracı Etkisi. Kadın/Woman 2000, Journal for Women's Studies, 24(1), 27-54.
• Kim, Y. H., Cohen, D. ve Au, W. (2010). The jury and abjury of my peers: The self in face and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 904–916. doi:10.1037/a0017936
• Kulwicki, A. D. (2002). The practice of honor crimes: A glimpse of domestic violence in the Arab world. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 23(1), 77-87. doi: 10.1080/01612840252825491
• Kuşdil, M. E. ve Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Türk öğretmenlerin değer yönelimleri ve Schwartz değer kuramı. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(45), 59-76.
• Levant, R. F. ve Richmond, K. (2008). A review of research on masculinity ideologies using the Male Role Norms Inventory. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15(2), 130-146. doi: 10.3149/jms.1502.130
• Levin, S., Roccas, S., Sidanius, J. ve Pratto, F. (2015). Personal values and intergroup outcomes of concern for group honor. Personality and Individual differences, 86, 374-384. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.047
• Luyt, R. (2018). Masculinities representations inventory (MRI, English version): A measure of gender (re) presentation. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 26(2), 157-183. doi: 10.1177/1060826517736781
• Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P., Gottfried, M. ve Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3-25. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
• Markus, H. R. ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
• Martin, R. C. (2004). Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim world. United States: Thomson Gale.
• McNulty, J. K. ve Widman, L. (2014). Sexual narcissism and infidelity in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1315-1325. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0282-6
• Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Monaco, G., Piermatteo, A., Rateau, P. ve Tavani, J. L. (2016). Methods for studying the structure of social representations: A critical review and agenda for future research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3), 306-331. doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12124
• Moreno, X., Sánchez, H., Huerta, M., Albala, C. ve Márquez, C. (2016). Social representations of older adults among Chilean elders of three cities with different historical and sociodemographic background. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 31, 115-128. doi: 10.1007/s10823-016-9288-y
• Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding içinde (181-209). The Hague: Nijhoff
• Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 211-250. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
• Moscovici, S. (1994). Social representations and pragmatic communication. Social Science Information, 33(2), 163-177. doi: 10.1177/053901894033002002
• Moscovici, S. ve Marková, I. (1998). Presenting social representations: A conversation. Culture & Psychology, 4(3), 371-410. doi: 10.1177/1354067X98004003
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E. ve Rudman, L. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11(2), 140-151.
• Pimental, E. E. (2006). Gender ideology, household behavior, and backlash in Urban China. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 341–365. doi: 10.1177/0192513X05283507
• Quenza, C. J. P. (2005). On the structural approach to social representations. Theory & Psychology, 15(1), 77-100. doi: 10.1177/0959354305049746
• Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M. (2011). Masculine and feminine honor codes. Revista de Psicología Social, 26(1), 63-72. doi: 10.1174/021347411794078499
• Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M. (2013). In the name of honor: On virtue, reputation and violence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(3), 271-278. doi: 10.1177/1368430212472590
• Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M. (2016). On the importance of family, morality, masculine, and feminine honor for theory and research, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(8), 431–442. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12262
• Rudman, L. A. ve Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61-79. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
• Sakallı, N. (2019). “Erkek” olmak ya da olmamak: Sosyal psikolojik açıdan erkeksilik/erkeklik çalışmaları. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44), 52-76 doi: 10.31828/tpy1301996120190516m000014
• Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. ve Akbaş, G. (2013). Namus kültürlerinde “namus” ve “namus adına kadına şiddet”: sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 16(32), 76-91.
• Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Türkoğlu, B. ve Kuzlak, A. (2018). How are women and men perceived? structure of gender stereotypes in contemporary Turkey. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(13), 309-336. doi: 10.7816/nesne-06-13-04
• Sakallı Uğurlu, N., Türkoğlu, B., Kuzlak, A. ve Gupta, A. (2021). Stereotypes of single and married women and men in Turkish culture. Current Psychology, 40, 213-225. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-9920-9
• Sarrica, M., Mingo, I., Mazzara, B. ve Leone, G. (2016). The effects of lemmatization on textual analysis conducted with IRaMuTeQ: results in comparison. 13ème Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, Nice.
• Seo, Y. J., Cheah, C. S. ve Cho, H. S. (2020). The gender ideology of ‘Wise Mother and Good Wife’and Korean immigrant women’s adjustment in the United States. Nursing Inquiry, 27(4), e12357. doi: doi.org/10.1111/nin.12357
• Sever, A. ve Yurdakul, G. (2001). Culture of honor, culture of change: A feminist analysis of honor killings in Turkey. Violence against Women, 7, 964-998. doi: 10.1177/10778010122182866 Shimberg, J., Josephs, L. ve Grace, L. (2016). Empathy as a mediator of attitudes toward infidelity among college students. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 42(4), 353-368. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2015.1053019
• Singleton, R., Sabben, G. ve Winskell, K. (2021). The spectrum of sexual transaction: representations in young Africans’ HIV-themed creative narratives. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 23(6), 740-756. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1727568
• Souza, M. A. R. D., Wall, M. L., Thuler, A. C. D. M. C., Lowen, I. M. V. ve Peres, A. M. (2018). The use of IRAMUTEQ software for data analysis in qualitative research. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 52, 1-7. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2017015003353
• Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L. ve Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1673-1682. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1673
• Thompson, E. H. ve Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29(5), 531-543. doi: 10.1177/00027648602900500
• Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H. ve Ferrera, D. L. (1992). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573-607.
• Türk Dil Kurumu Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. (2023, 2 Şubat). Erişim adresi https://sozluk.gov.tr/
• Uskul, A. K., Cross, S. E., Gunsoy, C. ve Gul, P. (2019). Cultures of honor. S. Kitayama ve D. Cohen (Ed.), Handbook of cultural psychology içinde (793-821). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Uyheng, J. ve Montiel, C. J. (2020). Cognitive polyphasia in a global south populist democracy: mapping social representations of Duterte’s regime in the Philippines. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(1), 30-52. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1119
• Vandello, J. A. ve Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
• Vandello, J. A. ve Cohen, D. (2008). Culture, gender, and men's intimate partner violence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 652-667. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00080.xf
• Vandello, J. A., Cohen, D., Grandon, R. ve Franiuk, R. (2009). Stand by your man: Indirect prescriptions for honorable violence and feminine loyalty in Canada, Chile, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 81-104. doi: 10.1177/0022022108326194
• Vandello, J. A., Cohen, D. ve Ransom, S. (2008). US Southern and Northern differences in perceptions of norms about aggression: Mechanisms for the perpetuation of a culture of honor. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(2), 162-177. doi: 10.1177/0022022107313862
• Van Osch, Y. ve Ermers, R. (2019). To a more systematic approach of studying honor and honor-related violence: Relating dishonor to an immoral reputation. https://osf.io/2a3cr/
• Willott, S. ve Griffin, C. (2004). Redundant men: Constraints on identity change. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 53–69. doi: 10.1002/casp.762
• Winegard, B. M., Winegard, B. ve Geary, D. C. (2014). Eastwood's brawn and Einstein's brain: An evolutionary account of dominance, prestige, and precarious manhood. Review of General Psychology, 18(1), 34-48.
• Wu, K., Chen, C. ve Greenberger, E. (2019). Nice guys and gals can finish first: Personality and speed-dating success among Asian Americans. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(8), 2507-2527. doi: 10.1177/0265407518790103
• Yalım, Ö. (2006). Türkçe'de yakın ve karşıt anlamlılar sözlüğü. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.