Exploring Adaptation Abilities of Barley Genotypes in Van Growing Conditions for Biomass and Grain Yield

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 91 - 99, 31.03.2023

Sana Salih , Bulut Öngün , Burak Özdemir , Erol Oral , Fevzi Altuner , Şadiye demir Atmaca Demir Atmaca , Mehmet Ülker

https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1199884

Öz

Discovering the variation among genotypes is an important criterion for selecting the suitable cultivar for a certain environment. The study aimed to explore the genetic variation among 17 genotypes of barley based on grain yield and some related traits. Plants were grown under field grown conditions in the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 growing seasons, and plant height (PH), spike per square meter (SSM), spike length (SL), spikelets per spike (NSS), seed per spike (SPS), biological yield (BY), grain yield (GY), and thousand grain weight (TGW) were measured. Results indicated that PH ranged (51.7 to 81.33 cm) and (58.20 to 79.90 cm), SSM (374 to 582) and (418 to 701), SL (7.10 to 9.63 cm) and (6.87 to 9.13 cm), NSS (9 to 15) and (8 to 17), SPS (21 to 49) and (21 to 51), BY (3466.7 to 5905.3 kg h-1) and (3731.7 to 6080 kg h-1), GY (1442 to 2192 kg h-1) and (811.8 to 1763.7 kg h-1), TGW (34 to 55.67 g) and (33.47 to 52.63 g) for the first and second year of experiment respectively. The advanced lines measurement values were higher in the second year of the experiment. It can be concluded that the advanced lines Anka-08 and Anka-11 are promising in most of the parameters. Some of the old and new cultivars still preserve their yield potential.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Advanced lines of barley, Barley cultivars, Grain yield

Kaynakça

• Ahmadi, J., Vaezi, B., & Pour-Aboughadareh, A. (2016). Analysis of variability, heritability, and interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in barley advanced lines. Genetika, 48(1), 73-85. DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1601073A.
• Ay, H., Aykanat, S., Anay, A., Akkaya, M. R., & Zeybek, A. (2018). Agronomic and Quality Evaluation of Rainfed Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) in Eastern Mediterranean Condition.
• Beşer, N., Kaya, Y., Civi, G., & GumusS, T. (2019). The evaluation of yield performances of some barley cultivars in Trakya region. Paper presented at the International Bioogical, Agricultural and Life Science Congress.
• Biel, W., Kazimierska, K., & Bashutska, U. (2020). Nutritional value of wheat, triticale, barley and oat grains. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Zootechnica, 19 (2), 19-28. doi:10.21005/asp.2020.19.2.03
• Cockram, J., Horsnell, R., Soh, E. H., Norris, C., & O’Sullivan, D. M. (2015). Molecular and phenotypic characterization of the alternative seasonal growth habit and flowering time in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.). Molecular Breeding, 35(8), 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-015-0359-5.
• Cuesta-Marcos, A., Kling, J.G., Belcher, A.R., Filichkin, T., Fisk, P., Graebner, R., Helgerson, L., Herb, D., Meints, B., Ross, A.S., Hayes, P.M., & Ulrich, S.E. (2016). Barley: Genetics and Breeding. In C. Wrigley, H. Corke, K. Seetharaman & J. Faubion (Eds), Encyclopedia of Food Grains (pp. 287-295). Academic Press.
• Dorostkar, S., Pakniyat, H., Kordshooli, M. A., Aliakbari, M., Sobhanian, N., Ghorbani, R., & Eskandari, M. (2015). Study of relationship between grain yield and yield components using multivariate analysis in barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Agriculture Research, 6, 240-250.
• Erol, Oral, Kendal, E., & Dogan, Y. (2017). Investigation of yield and some quality criteria of summer barley genotypes in Adıyaman and Şanlıurfa-Hilvan conditions. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture, 31 (2), 23-36.
• Ertuş, M. M. (2021). A Research on the Determination of Grain Yield of Some Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties in Late Autumn Sowing in The High Altitude Agricultural Area of Anatolia. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss1pp210-215
• FAO, (2022). Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize. Access date: 03.11.2020.
• Güngör, H., Cakir, M. F., & Dumlupinar, Z. (2022). Evaluation of wheat genotypes: genotype× environment interaction and gge biplot analysis. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27(1), 149-157. DOI: 10.17557/tjfc.1081513
• Güney, M. (2019). Effect of grain processing at different barley varieties on nutrient compositions, starch contents and in vitro digestion parameters. Progress in nutrition, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v21i3.8571
• Kılıç, H., Akar, T., Kendal, E., & Sayım, I. (2010). Evaluation of grain yield and quality of barley varieties under rainfed conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(46), 7825-7830.
• Mirosavljević, M., Momčilović, V., Mikić, S., Abicić, I., & Pržulj, N. (2020). Breeding progress in grain filling and grain yield components of six-rowed winter barley. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 107(3), 271-278. DOI 10.13080/z-a.2020.107.035.
• Mirosavljević, M., Momčilović, V., Pržulj, N., Ristov, N., Aćin, V., Čanak, P., & Denčić, S. (2016). The variation of agronomic traits associated with breeding progress in winter barley cultivars. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 103(3), 267-272. DOI 10.13080/z-a.2016.103.034.
• Saroei, E., Cheghamirza, K., & Zarei, L. (2017). Genetic diversity of characteristics in barley cultivars. Genetika, 49(2), 495-510. Doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1702495S.
• Sullivan, P., Arendt, E., & Gallagher, E. (2013). The increasing use of barley and barley by-products in the production of healthier baked goods. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 29(2), 124-134. doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.10.005.
• Vasilescu, L., PetcuE, S. A., Petcu, E., & Lazăr, C. (2022). Grain morphometry analysis of Romanian winter barley cultivars registered during 1959-2019 period. Romanian Agricultural Research, 39, 165-173. DOI 2067-5720 RAR 2022-155
• Zhong, B. H., Wiersma, J. J., Sheaffer, C. C., Steffenson, B. J., & Smith, K. P. (2019). Assessment of winter barley in Minnesota: relationships among cultivar, fall seeding date, winter survival, and grain yield. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 5(1), 1-8. doi:10.2134/cftm2019.07.005.