In addition to complying with the writing rules of the articles to be published in the In addition to complying with the writing rules of the articles to be published in the Young Thinkers Journal, it should have an academic, simple and integrative language for society. Articles with divisive and marginalizing language are not accepted. In the studies published in our journal, compliance with national and international ethical rules and research and publication ethics is required.

AUTHORS

The following mandatory documents must be uploaded for the ethics committee documents such as surveys, interviews, etc. conducted in the field of Social Sciences.

1. It is mandatory to take data from individuals for studies/articles where data needs to be collected using scales, surveys, interviews and other data collection tools.

2. The author must have received approval from the Ethics Committee of the university to which he is affiliated.

3. In studies requiring ethics committee permission, information about the permission (board name, date and number no) should be included in the method section and also on the first / last page of the article.

4. In case reports, it is necessary to include information in the article that the informed voluntary consent / consent form has been signed.

IN ADDITION;

It is the author's responsibility that the submitted article is of a quality that will contribute to academic fields.
The studies should be original and based on research.
The article should not be sent to different journals at the same time.
It should be ensured that the other authors whose names will be written in the article contribute to the research. It is against scientific ethics to show people who do not have academic contributions as additional authors or to rank authors with non-scientific criteria such as title, age and gender, regardless of the order of contribution.
It is assumed that the authors who submit articles to the journal have read and accepted the publication and writing principles of the journal and the authors are deemed to have committed to what is expected of them in these principles.
Citations and bibliography should be complete.
Authors should take care to provide the documents and information requested by the editor in a timely manner during the processing process.
Authors should make the referee evaluations appropriately and in a timely manner and indicate through the system that the necessary changes have been made.
Authors should inform the editor of the deficiencies or erroneous situations they see in the evaluation processes in a timely manner.
Authors should read the writing, evaluation and publication rules of the journal well and act according to these criteria.
Authors should know that they do not have the right to sort and select numbers for their accepted publications. They should act knowing that they can only give an opinion to the editor for the order of publication or issue and that this opinion will be decided by the editorial board.
Care is taken to publish an article sent to the journal at the end of the process in which it is sent. However, in accordance with the decision of the editorial board, the decision on this issue belongs to the editorial board.
Authors should take into consideration the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive also specified by the Council of Higher Education.

EDITORS:

Editors will pay attention to the criteria requested by Ulakbim and determined below.

It should be constantly in search of innovations in order to improve the journal and manage the processes well.

In order for the authors to use the process well, they should declare the detailed necessary information visibly on the journal page.

The submitted work's Copyright Transfer Form and Similarity Report should check the Ethics Permit (if necessary).

Accept articles appropriate to the purpose and scope of the journal.

Impact requires board approval; live experiments, surveys, interviews, etc. should check the permission dates of the Ethics committee.

The article should definitely be taken through the dergipark system. should not manage the article processes via mail.

Provide the necessary information and documents to the referees.

Should not use a derogatory style towards the Author and Referees.

Attention should be paid to the confidentiality of the referees.

It is not possible for the referee to share the study with another person or to include it in the evaluation process without the permission of the editor. The editor should control this process and intervene when necessary.

Check whether the author has previously published the study and, if so, whether he has explicitly declared this.

In order for the evaluation processes to run healthily, the system must be constantly checked.

When necessary, the referee should change.

The evaluation of the rejection or acceptance of an article should be determined according to the opinions of the referees.

The decision process of an article belongs entirely to the editor. Referee evaluations are effective elements in the decision-making process.      it should have an academic, simple and integrative language for society. Articles with divisive and marginalizing language are not accepted. In the studies published in our journal, compliance with national and international ethical rules and research and publication ethics is required.

AUTHORS

The following mandatory documents must be uploaded for the ethics committee documents such as surveys, interviews, etc. conducted in the field of Social Sciences.

1. It is mandatory to take data from individuals for studies/articles where data needs to be collected using scales, surveys, interviews and other data collection tools.

2. The author must have received approval from the Ethics Committee of the university to which he is affiliated.

3. In studies requiring ethics committee permission, information about the permission (board name, date and number no) should be included in the method section and also on the first / last page of the article.

4. In case reports, it is necessary to include information in the article that the informed voluntary consent / consent form has been signed.

IN ADDITION;

It is the author's responsibility that the submitted article is of a quality that will contribute to academic fields.
The studies should be original and based on research.
The article should not be sent to different journals at the same time.
It should be ensured that the other authors whose names will be written in the article contribute to the research. It is against scientific ethics to show people who do not have academic contributions as additional authors or to rank authors with non-scientific criteria such as title, age and gender, regardless of the order of contribution.
It is assumed that the authors who submit articles to the journal have read and accepted the publication and writing principles of the journal and the authors are deemed to have committed to what is expected of them in these principles.
Citations and bibliography should be complete.
Authors should take care to provide the documents and information requested by the editor in a timely manner during the processing process.
Authors should make the referee evaluations appropriately and in a timely manner and indicate through the system that the necessary changes have been made.
Authors should inform the editor of the deficiencies or erroneous situations they see in the evaluation processes in a timely manner.
Authors should read the writing, evaluation and publication rules of the journal well and act according to these criteria.
Authors should know that they do not have the right to sort and select numbers for their accepted publications. They should act knowing that they can only give an opinion to the editor for the order of publication or issue and that this opinion will be decided by the editorial board.
Care is taken to publish an article sent to the journal at the end of the process in which it is sent. However, in accordance with the decision of the editorial board, the decision on this issue belongs to the editorial board.
Authors should take into consideration the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive also specified by the Council of Higher Education.

EDITORS:

Editors will pay attention to the criteria requested by Ulakbim and determined below.

It should be constantly in search of innovations in order to improve the journal and manage the processes well.

In order for the authors to use the process well, they should declare the detailed necessary information visibly on the journal page.

The submitted work's Copyright Transfer Form and Similarity Report should check the Ethics Permit (if necessary).

Accept articles appropriate to the purpose and scope of the journal.

Impact requires board approval; live experiments, surveys, interviews, etc. should check the permission dates of the Ethics committee.

The article should definitely be taken through the dergipark system. should not manage the article processes via mail.

Provide the necessary information and documents to the referees.

Should not use a derogatory style towards the Author and Referees.

Attention should be paid to the confidentiality of the referees.

It is not possible for the referee to share the study with another person or to include it in the evaluation process without the permission of the editor. The editor should control this process and intervene when necessary.

Check whether the author has previously published the study and, if so, whether he has explicitly declared this.

In order for the evaluation processes to run healthily, the system must be constantly checked.

When necessary, the referee should change.

The evaluation of the rejection or acceptance of an article should be determined according to the opinions of the referees.

The decision process of an article belongs entirely to the editor. Referee evaluations are effective elements in the decision-making process.