In the first stage, the study is evaluated in terms of plagiarism, suitability for the journal and spelling rules. The editor initiates the double blind peer review process. The referees reject or accept the study, or give corrections. Referees look at the following qualifications at this stage;

-Whether the work is original or new,

-Good explanation of study design and method

-Considering new studies on the subject,

-Consistency of purpose, method, analysis, findings and results,

-The results are presented appropriately and clearly,

-The suitability of the study for the journal,

-The study was written according to the journal rules,

-The results are reliable, meaningful and supported by research,

After the answers of at least two referees are evaluated, chief editor make the final decision. If the study is accepted for publication, it is sent to the language editor. If the language editor does not see fit, it can request proofread or, if it sees fit, it is sent to the misanpage editor to be ready for publication.