Peer Review Process

* All transactions in the journal's publication process are carried out at http://dergipark.org.tr/mahder.
* In the articles sent to the journal, firstly, the compliance of the article with the publication rules is examined. Articles that comply with the rules of publication are primarily evaluated by the editor. The articles that pass the editor's preliminary evaluation are directed to two referees who are experts in their fields. Authors are contacted in accordance with the reports of the referees in the articles that receive the printable report from both referees and requested correction.
* The authors are asked to send the article again by making the corrections requested by the referees. The referee reports, which cannot be published, will be notified to the article owner. Reports that are positive from one of the referees and negative from the other are directed to a third referee. The publication is decided based on the opinions of the third referee.
* The referees are asked to evaluate the articles within 15 days. With the expiration of the 15-day period, a reminder message is sent, which gives an additional period of 7 (seven) days. At the end of this period, another referee is appointed instead of the referee who does not respond to the evaluation.
* Double-blind referee system is applied in the journal. No information about the author(s), institutions etc. is sent to the referees. In this way, unbiased reviews of the referees are provided.

* Copyright Transfer Form and COPE Additional Declarations Form are requested from the authors of the articles whose evaluation process is concluded positively during the publication process.

* This journal has adopted open access policy in light of the rules set by the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Open access increases the global exchange of information and has beneficial consequences for humanity.



Creative Commons License

Last Update Time: 3/2/25, 9:56:13 PM