Articles published in our journal require compliance with nationally and internationally valid ethical rules and research and publication ethics. Therefore, the recommendations of the ICMJE (International Committee of Medcial Journal Editors) and the "International Standards for Editors and Authors" of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) should be taken into consideration in the studies sent to our journal by the authors, reviewers during the peer-review process and editors in management. In this direction, the principles that authors, reviewers and editors must comply with can be listed as follows;;
Scientific Research Ethics
Scientific methods are used in obtaining data, analyzing, interpreting and reaching the results. Unscientific results cannot be shown as research results.
While conducting the research, it is necessary to adhere to national and international agreements and to obtain permission from the competent authorities.
The data obtained in the studies should be used to the extent and in the form allowed by the authorities. It is essential that the data that should not be submitted remain confidential.
Researchers are obliged to report any adverse situations that may arise as a result of the research to the relevant persons and institutions. Every researcher has the right not to participate in the research due to these adverse situations that may occur.
Authors
It is the author's responsibility that the submitted article is qualified to contribute to academic fields.
Artciles must be original and based on research.
Although the plagiarism analysis will be done by the journal, the author (s) of the study are entirely responsible for the negativities and sanctions that may occur as a result of plagiarism. Plagiarism control of the studies to be published in the journal is carried out through the iThenticate package program and the similarity rate should not exceed 20% in plagiarism control.
The article should not be submitted to different journals at the same time and it should not have been sent to another journal before.
It should be ensured that other authors whose names will be written in the article contribute to the research. It is against the ethics of science to show people who have no academic contribution as additional authors or to rank authors with non-scientific criteria such as title, age and gender regardless of the order of contribution.
It is assumed that the authors who submit articles to the journal have read and accepted the publication and writing principles of the journal, and the authors are deemed to have committed to what is expected of them in these principles.
Citations and references should be complete.
Authors should consider the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive, which is also specified by the Higher Education Council. In this regard, the authors should notify the ethical permission reports they have received for their studies in the content of the study, and also send them to our journal editor.
During the evaluation phase, the authors should submit the raw data of the research in line with the reviewers' requests. In addition, if requested after the publication of the article, the raw data should be submitted to the editor of the journal.
If the authors have presented their work in any scientific meeting / congress / symposium before, this must be clearly stated in the study.
For multi-author studies, there must be a corresponding author who will contact the journal editor throughout the entire process of working. Corresponding author is considered to represent other authors in this process.
The scientific and legal responsibility of the published articles belongs to the authors. Turk-Jes is the publication organ of Fırat University, Institute of Educational Sciences. All copyrights of the published articles belong to Fırat University and they cannot be partially or completely printed, reproduced or transferred to the electronic environment without the permission of the publisher.


Reviewers
Reviewers should be impartial while evaluating the studies and should not have a conflict of interest with the authors.
Reviewers should act with the awareness that they are the main determinants of the academic quality of the article to be published in the journal, and evaluate them with the responsibility of increasing academic quality.
The reviewers should indicate, if any, published works related to the work but not cited.
Reviewers should only accept peer-review of articles that they have the expertise to make an appropriate review, can respect blind review confidentiality, and keep the details of the article confidential in any way.
After the article review process, any information about the article reviewed should not be shared with others in any way.
Reviewers should only evaluate the accuracy of the content of the articles and their compliance with academic criteria. The fact that the opinions expressed in the article differ from those of the reviewer should not affect the evaluation.
Reviewer reports should be objective and measured. Insulting, derogatory and accusatory statements should be avoided.
Reviewers should avoid superficial and ambiguous statements in evaluation reports. In the evaluations with negative results, the missing and flawed points on which the result is based should be shown in a concrete way.
Reviewers should evaluate the articles within the time given to them. If they are not going to make an assessment, they should notify the journal within a reasonable time.
Editors
Editors should accept articles that contribute to the relevant fields specified in the journal policy into the evaluation process.
Editors should not have any conflict of interest / relationship with accepted or rejected articles.
Editors have full responsibility and authority to accept or reject an article.
Editors must support the publication or retraction of the correction when errors are found.
It is the editors' responsibility to keep the names of reviewers and authors mutually confidential.
Editors should make the necessary effort to screen articles submitted for publication for plagiarism and thus to prevent academic dishonor.
It is the editors' duty to complete the pre-examination, review, editing and publishing processes of the articles submitted to the journal in a timely and healthy manner.
Editors should review academic concerns and criteria when accepting articles to the journal.